Verify bank statements before you lend: extract every transaction, recompute balances, flag inconsistencies, deposit concentration and suspicious patterns that summary pages hide.
Upload a document to extract
Drop files here or click to upload
Up to 50 files
Uploading...
Upload a bank statement and watch the analysis run live, free, no signup required.
Statement fraud is rising because editing a PDF is trivial. Verification needs math: LenderAnalyzer rebuilds the full transaction ledger, recomputes running balances and period totals, and flags where the numbers don't add up, alongside risk signals like concentrated deposits and irregular income patterns. Reviewers see extracted data next to the original image for fast side-by-side checks.
A statement can be faked in two ways: the numbers can be altered, or a clean forgery can be built that still adds up. Different checks catch different fakes, and knowing which is which keeps you from trusting one method to catch everything.
The fastest fraud to catch is a statement where someone changed a figure and did not fix everything downstream. LenderAnalyzer rebuilds the full transaction ledger from the PDF and recomputes every running balance and period total, so a deposit that was inflated, a withdrawal that was deleted or an ending balance that does not follow from the transactions surfaces immediately. This is math the forger has to get perfectly consistent across dozens of lines, and most do not. It is the first check because it is objective and it does not depend on having seen that forgery pattern before.
Arithmetic verification cannot catch a forgery that is internally consistent, a fabricated statement built to add up correctly. Two other methods close that gap. Open banking feeds like Plaid pull balances and transactions straight from the bank, so the data never passes through a PDF the borrower could edit, though they only cover accounts the borrower agrees to link. Document forensics tools score fonts, metadata and template patterns to spot a file edited after the bank produced it. A thorough verification workflow uses reconciliation first and reaches for a bank feed or a forensics tool when the statement is high-stakes or something feels off.
Verification is not only about whether the document is authentic; a real statement can still show a risky account. Once the ledger is rebuilt, the same data reveals deposit concentration where one customer or one round-number transfer drives most of the inflow, income that arrives in irregular bursts rather than a steady pattern, and existing debt service leaving the account daily. These are not fraud, but they change the credit decision, and they are invisible on the summary page a borrower is most likely to hand you. Reading the full ledger catches both the fake and the merely fragile.
A borrower under pressure hands over the cleanest month and hopes you stop there. Verification is stronger across the full period your policy requires, three, six or twelve months, because gaps and inconsistencies show up between statements as well as within them. LenderAnalyzer flags any missing statement period and lets a reviewer see the extracted data beside the original image for a fast side-by-side check on every month, not just the one that looks best. Verifying the sequence, not a single page, is what turns a spot check into real assurance.
How each approach confirms a statement is genuine and what it actually catches. Last updated June 2026; third-party pricing changes, so confirm current figures with each vendor.
Swipe sideways to see the full comparison
| Approach | How it verifies the statement | What it catches | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| LenderAnalyzer This page | Rebuilds the full transaction ledger from the PDF, recomputes running balances and period totals, and shows the extracted data beside the source image | Arithmetic that does not reconcile, impossible balance sequences, deposit concentration and irregular income patterns on the submitted document | Self-serve, $99 to $399/mo |
| Open banking feeds (Plaid and similar) | Connects to the account directly, so balances and transactions come from the bank instead of a PDF the borrower could edit | Verified data for accounts the borrower agrees to link and banks the provider supports, but no fraud verdict on a submitted statement and gaps when an account is not linked | Per-connection / API pricing |
| AI fraud detection (Inscribe and similar) | Scores the document with machine learning against metadata, fonts and known forgery patterns | Forgery signals a model has been trained on; strong on document forensics, lighter on building the underwriting numbers | Quote-based / enterprise |
| Generic statement OCR (DocuClipper, MoneyThumb) | Converts the PDF to spreadsheet rows; some add balance or basic fraud flags | A table of transactions you then check yourself, so verification depth depends on the work you do after export | Low monthly cost |
| Manual review | An analyst inspects formatting and logos and recomputes the totals by hand | Obvious edits and math errors a careful reviewer notices, but it is slow and varies from one reviewer to the next | Staff time |
Comparison compiled by LenderAnalyzer from public vendor materials, June 2026. Competitor names are trademarks of their respective owners; figures may change, so verify current details with each vendor.
Computed deterministically from every extracted transaction, every figure traceable to its source line.
Computed across the full statement period, carried forward day by day.
Deposits vs withdrawals and net flow, broken down month by month.
Every insufficient-funds and overdraft incident counted, with fees totaled.
Recurring deposits grouped into income streams with estimated monthly amounts.
Debits to other lenders and funders detected and totaled per month.
Days below zero across the period, a direct stress signal.
The biggest credits with dates and sources, concentration flagged.
Automatic red and yellow flags your analysts can review in seconds.
Drop in PDFs, scans or photos, one statement or a multi-month package, from any bank.
Every transaction is extracted, then cash flow, balances, income streams, NSF activity and debt payments are computed.
Read the underwriting snapshot, download the Excel report, or pull structured JSON into your LOS via API.
28 lending document types extracted out of the box, build the complete picture of an applicant's financial situation.
Common questions from lending and credit teams.
The process of confirming a submitted bank statement is genuine and its figures internally consistent, checking that transactions, running balances and period totals reconcile, and that income patterns look organic.
It recomputes balances from the transaction ledger and compares against stated opening/closing balances; mismatches, impossible sequences and concentration anomalies generate flags for manual review.
Lenders confirm a statement is genuine and internally consistent before they rely on it. The fastest check is to rebuild the transaction ledger and recompute the running balance and period totals: if opening balance plus deposits minus withdrawals does not equal the stated closing balance, the document was altered. LenderAnalyzer runs that math automatically and flags the mismatches.
Check the math first, because a real statement always reconciles: opening balance plus deposits minus withdrawals equals the closing balance. Then watch for inconsistent fonts or spacing, misaligned columns, round-number deposits, and a running balance that does not match the transaction history. Automated recomputation catches arithmetic tampering the eye misses on a clean-looking PDF.
Yes, extraction is AI-based and works across bank formats, so verification logic applies uniformly whether the statement comes from Chase, a local credit union or a neobank.
No, it runs as part of the same extraction pass, typically under two minutes per statement, so verification happens before the first human touch.
Flags appear on the analysis with details; your team reviews the highlighted transactions against the source image and decides whether to request originals or decline.
LenderAnalyzer is self-serve with public pricing: Starter $99, Plus $199 and Pro $399 per month, with about 50% off on annual plans. Verification runs in the same extraction pass as the analysis, so you are not paying separately for a fraud check. Many enterprise fraud platforms are quote-based and run far higher.
How credit teams run these calculations by hand, so you can see exactly what the software automates.
Counting incidents and fees the way an underwriter will defend them.
Turning transaction detail into month-by-month cash flow you can compare.
Finding undisclosed debt in the debits before it becomes your problem.
Why reading the page and understanding it are two different jobs.
Analyze your first statements free, plans from $99/month, 50% off billed annually.
